libertariansf Forum Index libertariansf
A forum for libertarian fans and writers of speculative fiction.
 
 HomeHome   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups    CalendarCalendar    RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Welcome
Welcome to libertariansf.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

American vs. British SF

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    libertariansf Forum Index -> Boundary Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
libertariansf
Site Admin


Joined: 12 Dec 2007
Posts: 9
Location: Bellevue, NE

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:38 pm    Post subject: American vs. British SF Reply with quote

Are there any major differences between American and British SF? If so, what are they and what is the reason for them?

In the latest issue of Locus Magazine (Dec 2007), reviewer Graham Sleight says a couple of interesting things about the differences between American and British SF:

Quote:
One of the interesting tensions in [Greg] Bear's work is between the American and British strains of SF. Broadly (and here I'm borrowing from Brian Stableford's The Scientific Romance in Britain (1985)), British SF derives from the scientific romance tradition of Wells and Stapledon, in which protagonists observe (often in wonder) but do not change the world. In American SF, they do, and the future is something to be worked on, conquered, perhaps owned.


I definitely have a greater affinity for the American strain. The British strain seems to lend itself well to cynical or satirical dystopian stories; the American strain more likely to be hopeful and productive of a libertarian future. Ayn Rand's Anthem is a dystopian novella with a distinctly American ending.

Quote:
In a sense, [Alastair] Reynolds's book [Revelation Space (2000)] should be seen here as emblematic of what other British writers have been doing recently: taking the props of American SF and putting a distinctive dark perspective on them. .... The end of the book opens up the sort of cosmological perspectives one associates with Stapledon (or Baxter), but does so in a story where individual actions make a difference.


I'm not a huge fan of the cosmological perspective stories in which individual actions don't make much difference. They're dreadfully pessimistic and dark. And while a cosmological perspective, used in moderation, can offer us a wider perspective on the present, it is a mistake to think that this perspective is primary for telling/showing us what is really important and valuable. I think some SF authors make this mistake. Is it a distinctively British one?
_________________
Yours in liberty,
Geoffrey Allan Plauche

"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
("Who watches the watchmen?")
-Juvenal, Satires VI.347
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
wombatron



Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think that dystopianism is universal in British sf, although I haven't read enough of it to really be sure. For example, Ian Banks is pretty optimistic in his "Culture" stories (although the Culture is a communist "post-scarcity" society that can be criticized on other grounds). The stuff about Reynolds is right, though; he tends to be pretty pessimistic. The ending of Redemption Ark, the ending of the "Inhibitor" story arc of the Revelation Space universe, pretty much goes about and says that all of the striving of the past 1000 or so pages was in vein.
_________________
"Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but we rather have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit." --Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
veritasnoctis
Site Admin


Joined: 12 Dec 2007
Posts: 31
Location: Bellevue, NE

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I doubt it is universal myself. These things are usually just identifiable distinctive tendencies. The waters are muddied by intellectual cross-pollination between the two countries. Writers from one country can easily be influenced by writers of the other. But the culture they grow up in will have a strong influence as well. I haven't read enough British SF myself either, or even enough American SF really...I'm still playing catch-up. I read some science fiction as a kid, but much more fantasy.
_________________
Yours in liberty,
Geoffrey Allan Plauche

"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
("Who watches the watchmen?")
-Juvenal, Satires VI.347
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    libertariansf Forum Index -> Boundary Discussions All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Community Chest


Powered by phpBB
Hosted by FreeForums.org